Saturday 6 April 2013

Why are badgers protected?

Following on from some of the stuff on Twitter recently, I thought I'd ask the simple question; Why are badgers protected? You see, to a simple countryman like me, I can understand why some species need to be protected; they may be rare, as in the case of some birds of prey, or they may be harmless, like some songbirds. The trouble is, neither of these apply to badgers. The fact is; in the Southwest of England, there are just too many badgers for the good of them, and the environment they live in. Just take hedgehogs for an example. Old Brock like hedgehogs. They make a nice little badger snack. In West Cornwall, during the RBCT (Randomised Badger Culling Trials), the University of Warwick did a survey of the proactive cull area before culling started. What did they find? Lots of badgers and few, if any, hedgehogs. The badgers had pretty much wiped them out. Post cull, another survey was done, and found that where the badger population had been reduced, hedgehog numbers had started to recover. That is what is known as Wildlife Management. When one species becomes so numerous that it starts to impact on other, rarer species, we step in and try and redress the balance with an overall positive effect on the environment as a whole. It's not just hedgehogs that are suffering under the strain of an ever increasing population of badgers either; bumblebees, ground nesting birds, newts, amphibians etc. They are all, gradually losing the fight to survive against such a huge, and overprotected badger population. So I ask again, why are badgers protected? Think about it. Foxes aren't protected, nor are deer. Both large mammal species, both rarer than badgers, both thriving and healthy. If the protected status of badgers was removed in those counties where they are endemic, what would the result be? The result would be landowners choosing for themselves whether to cull badgers or not. The badgers left would be more healthy, with less competition for food, hedgehogs and those other species that are being hoovered up at present would start to recover, and we wouldn't need any state organised cull. Those landowners who chose not to cull could sit happily watching their badgers multiply (and other species decrease)and everyone would be happy. Except the protectionist lunatics who want to protect badgers at the expense of everything else. They'll never be happy without a 'cause'. Coming soon: My bTB control strategy

12 comments:

  1. Matt'; Cheers for this, and the stuff above. I've only just discovered it because I got called into my own Control Panel. I'll have to subscribe by email .....

    Haven't read a word of it, yet. I've literally just stepped into the room and shall be busy for a bit yet. Then I'll have a good read.

    I'm fascinated to see your own view of what's going on over there. 'll bet it's absolutely nothing like our situation. Your cattlemen would be tearing their hair out, if they knew how we handle things ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey-up Ditchy! How's that new drill? Earning it's keep yet?

    Thanks for the comment, you are right of course, every year the badger problem gets worse and worse, and sadly, the badger apologists (that's a twitterism, sorry) just don't get it...

    Got a little trapping diary coming out next week. You may enjoy it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Right. Read that.

    I think ye have it in; " They'll never be happy without a 'cause'. "

    Think about it, Matt'. It's all back to " The Struggle " again, isn't it. It's not so much 'Them For Badgers' as Them Getting One Over On The Man. They make the government, even 'The People' bend to their will and it makes them feel ..... I'm sorry to even utter this term. But; " Empowered ".

    ReplyDelete
  4. Utter rubbish matt

    ReplyDelete
  5. Really Anon?

    Care to elaborate just a little, or aren't you capable?

    I don't mind people not agreeing with me, but at least have the courtesy to explain why.

    Matt

    ReplyDelete
  6. It's always the " 'Nony's " that spit at us, Matt.

    These days, I listen to see if they actually have anything to say. Then f**k them off out of it if they start trying to use My place as Their bandstand.

    Looks like we have a similar approach ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Im a dairy farmer not a badgerist. But blogs full of opinions and no facts Matt.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Opinions based on facts Anon.

    For example, it is a FACT that the RBCT resulted in a recovery of hedgehog numbers when badgers were culled.

    It's also a FACT that we have many more badgers now than we had thirty years ago.

    What facts have you given?

    None.

    So really, even if you are a badger loving dairy farmer (which is quite a rare thing), I care nothing for your comments.

    Perhaps you'd like to expand on your accusation that my opinions are not based on fact?

    Thought not.

    Matt

    ReplyDelete
  9. Touchy matt. nobody can have a opinion but you?. You are not a expert. That shows, an neither am i. Theres a real sense of NFU prop' and i havent been sucked in. An like me theres a hell of a lot of farmers against culling. Me included.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Evidence is there. Look at the isle of man NO BADGERS and yet bTB is rife matt. So who else is to blame now? Farmers need to clean up husbandry and biosecurity the list goes on and on. Culling is not the answer. How can 5 thousand badgers me killed when only around 400 in hotspots will have bTB? Why no testing? Its a landowner NFU, farmer disgrace. Do you really believe the NFU dont care about farmers! Pull the other one. I am NOT AR i have researched both sides indepth and i eat meat and worked in a slaughter house. So im not a tree hugging bunny lover. Its common sense. Bronach from ireland.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Be not me a mistype in above comment.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Be not me a mistype in above comment bronach

    ReplyDelete